QoL · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in QOL scores (IBDQ) (higher scores better) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).
3 findings from 1 review
MD 4.6
1 study · 50 participants
Low
no estimate extracted
1 study · 119 participants
GRADE not reported
MD 2.4
1 study · 76 participants
Low
QoL · Women undergoing RT for gynecological cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · People with urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · Men undergoing RT for prostate cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · Men undergoing RT for prostate cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · people with Rectal Cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · People with pelvic cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · People with urological (prostate) and gynaecological (cervical) cancer
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
QoL · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · People undergoing radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · Men with prostate cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Counselling changes QOL scores (5‐point VAS; lower is better) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · People with urological (prostate) and gynaecological (cervical) cancer
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
QoL · Men with prostate cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · Men undergoing RT for prostate cancer
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found