Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 2 reviews · Implants and prosthodontics

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 50%High 0 · 0%

1-stage (non-submerged) implant placement vs 2-stage (submerged) implant placement

Prosthesis failure · People with dental implants

1-stage (non-submerged) implant placement showed no clear difference in prosthesis failure compared with 2-stage (submerged) implant placement (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1- versus 2-stage implant placement 2009 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 to 12 months after loading
RR 1.87 [0.33, 10.40]
3 studies · 153 participants
Moderate

Zygomatic implants without bone grafts (as a complete alternative to any bone augmentation procedure) vs Conventional dental implants in augmented maxillae

Prosthesis failure · Participants with an atrophic maxilla who cannot be rehabilitated with conventional dental implants due to lack of bone (including…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in zygomatic bone for the rehabilitation of the severely… 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
At least 1 year in function
Summary of findings 'Zygomatic implants versus conventional implants'; Prosthesis failure: Assumed risk (conventional) Low risk population 10 per 1000, High risk population 100 per 1000; Corresponding risk (zygomatic)…
0 studies
No studies found