Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1 questions · 1 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) in combination with SLT or other devices vs clinical judgement or usual care

Proportion of patients receiving FFP · adults or children with bleeding

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) in… showed no clear difference in proportion of patients receiving FFP compared with clinical judgement or usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thromboelastography (TEG) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM) to monitor haemostatic treatment versus usual care in adults… 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.46 [0.2, 1.08]
3 studies · 307 participants
Low