Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · pressure ulcer prevention
It is very uncertain whether alternating pressure (active) air surfaces changes proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer compared with reactive air surfaces (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · pressure ulcer prevention
It is very uncertain whether alternating pressure (active) air surfaces changes proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer compared with reactive water‐filled surfaces (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · pressure ulcer prevention
It is very uncertain whether alternating pressure (active) air surfaces changes proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer compared with reactive fibre surfaces (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces showed no clear difference in proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer compared with foam surfaces (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · pressure ulcer prevention
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces on operating tables and… may leads to lower proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer compared with reactive gel surfaces on operating tables followed by foam surfaces… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · pressure ulcer prevention
It is very uncertain whether reactive air surfaces changes proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer compared with alternating pressure (active) air surfaces (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · preventing pressure ulcers
It is very uncertain whether reactive water surfaces changes proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer compared with alternating pressure (active) air surfaces (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · preventing pressure ulcers
It is very uncertain whether reactive fibre surfaces changes proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer compared with alternating pressure (active) air surfaces (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · preventing pressure ulcers
Reactive gel surfaces on operating tables followed by foam surfaces… may leads to higher proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer compared with alternating pressure (active) air surfaces on operating tables and… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · pressure ulcer prevention
Foam surfaces showed no clear difference in proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer compared with alternating pressure (active) air surfaces (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review