Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews · Incontinence

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 50%Moderate 2 · 50%High 0 · 0%

Vaginal surgery with mesh vs non‐mesh repair

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical vaginal prolapse

Vaginal surgery with mesh showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with without mesh (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal hysteropexy vs sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse)

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse

Vaginal hysteropexy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal hysterectomy vs vaginal hysteropexy (uterine prolapse)

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical uterine prolapse

Vaginal hysterectomy showed no clear difference in prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with vaginal hysteropexy (uterine prolapse) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Vaginal procedure vs sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse)

Prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse · women with apical vaginal vault prolapse

Vaginal procedure probably leads to higher prolapse on examination (Stage 2 or above) ‐ Any recurrent prolapse compared with sacral colpopexy (vault prolapse) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review