Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 2 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Retzius‐sparing RALP vs standard RALP

Potency 12 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute difference · men (ages > 18 years) with clinically localized prostate cancer

It is very uncertain whether retzius‐sparing RALP changes potency 12 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute difference compared with standard RALP (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Retzius‐sparing versus standard robotic‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localized… 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.98 [0.54, 1.8]
1 study · 55 participants
Very low

Posterior reconstruction vs no posterior reconstruction

Potency 12 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute difference · men (ages > 18 years) with clinically localized prostate cancer

It is very uncertain whether posterior reconstruction changes potency recovery 12 months after surgery MCID: 5% absolute difference compared with no posterior reconstruction (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior musculofascial reconstruction in robotic‐assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.02 [0.82, 1.26]
2 studies · 308 participants
Very low