Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 1 · 50%High 0 · 0%

Traditional antenatal CTG vs no antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complication)

Perinatal mortality · Pregnant women with/without complications

Traditional antenatal CTG showed no clear difference in perinatal mortality compared with no antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complication) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.05 [0.95, 4.42]
4 studies · 1627 participants
Low

Computerised antenatal CTG vs traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications)

Perinatal mortality · Pregnant women with/without complications

Computerised antenatal CTG probably leads to lower perinatal mortality compared with traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Antenatal cardiotocography for fetal assessment 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.2 [0.04, 0.88]
2 studies · 469 participants
Moderate