Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · Incontinence

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2 · 66.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Electrical or magnetic stimulation vs no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction

Adherence · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative interventions for managing urinary incontinence after prostate surgery 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Combinations of conservative treatments vs no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction

Adherence · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery

It is very uncertain whether combinations of conservative treatments changes participant adherence to the intervention: as reported by the… compared with no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative interventions for managing urinary incontinence after prostate surgery 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.08 [0.78, 5.56]
2 studies · 763 participants
Very low

Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) plus biofeedback vs no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction

Adherence · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Conservative interventions for managing urinary incontinence after prostate surgery 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found