Overall survival (baseline risks for low‐ and high‐risk groups in the control arm were estimated at 1 year) · combination with third‐generation drugs for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer
Carboplatin showed no clear difference in overall survival (baseline risks for low‐ and high‐risk groups in… compared with cisplatin chemotherapy (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survivalNo. of participants: 2631(8 RCTs) · patients with newly diagnosed multiple brain metastases
WBRT and radiosurgery showed no clear difference in overall survivalNo. of participants: 358(2 RCTs) compared with WBRT (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 0.61 [0.27, 1.39]
Studies not reported
Moderate
Overall survivalNo. of participants: 2631(8 RCTs) · patients with newly diagnosed multiple brain metastases
Radiosurgery alone showed no clear difference in overall survivalNo. of participants: 403(3 RCTs) compared with WBRT and radiosurgery (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 1 [0.8, 1.25]
Studies not reported
Moderate
Overall survivalNo. of participants: 2631(8 RCTs) · patients with newly diagnosed multiple brain metastases
WBRT with radiosensitisers (radiosen) showed no clear difference in overall survivalNo. of participants: 2631(8 RCTs) compared with WBRT alone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
HR 1.05 [0.99, 1.12]
Studies not reported
Moderate
Overall survival ‐ Gemcitabine plus other agent(s) · advanced pancreatic cancer
Gemcitabine combinations showed no clear difference in overall survival ‐ Gemcitabine plus other agent(s) compared with gemcitabine alone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival ‐ Gemcitabine plus platinum agent · advanced pancreatic cancer
Gemcitabine combinations showed no clear difference in overall survival ‐ Gemcitabine plus platinum agent compared with gemcitabine alone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mortality (calculated instead of overall survival)
The intervention showed no clear difference in mortality (calculated instead of overall survival) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mortality (calculated instead of overall survival)
The intervention may leads to higher mortality (calculated instead of overall survival) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival ‐ Gemcitabine plus fluoropyrimidine · advanced pancreatic cancer
Gemcitabine combinations leads to lower overall survival ‐ Gemcitabine plus fluoropyrimidine compared with gemcitabine alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival ‐ Gemcitabine plus topoisomerase inhibitor · advanced pancreatic cancer
Gemcitabine combinations showed no clear difference in overall survival ‐ Gemcitabine plus topoisomerase inhibitor compared with gemcitabine alone (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Overall survival (OS) ‐ Network included 15 pairwise comparisons ‐ Median · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and an intermediate or poor risk according to the International…
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Subgroup analysis in pediatric patients: Overall survival [range of median · patients with APL in first complete remission
The intervention may leads to lower subgroup analysis in pediatric patients: Overall survival [range of… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
133 participants
Low
Intervention not reported
Overall survival (OS) ‐ Network (subnet 1) included 3 pairwise comparisons ‐ Median · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and a favourable risk according to the International Metastatic…
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Overall survival (OS) ‐ Network (subnet 1) included 5 pairwise comparisons ‐ Median · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and a favourable risk according to the International Metastatic…
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Overall survival (OS) ‐ Network (subnet 1) included 10 pairwise comparisons ‐ Median · people with a confirmed diagnosis of advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and an intermediate or poor risk according to the International…
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Tivozanib showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with sorafenib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
Sorafenib showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with pazopanib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
Sunitinib showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with everolimus (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 24 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
It is very uncertain whether sorafenib changes overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with sunitinib (targeted agent versus targeted agent) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival rate at 12 months) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Sunitinib showed no clear difference in overall survival (absolute effect size estimates based on survival… compared with IMA901 + sunitinib (targeted agent versus tumour vaccine + targeted… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review