Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews · Gynaecology and Fertility

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 1 · 50%High 0 · 0%

Ultrasound‐guided embryo transfer vs clinical touch

Ongoing pregnancy · Women undergoing embryo transfer as part of IVF or ICSI cycle

Ultrasound‐guided embryo transfer probably leads to higher ongoing pregnancy compared with clinical touch (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultrasound versus 'clinical touch' for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.4 [1.19, 1.66]
9 studies · 2742 participants
Moderate

Ultrasound‐guided embryo transfer vs clinical touch

Ongoing pregnancy / live birth rate per woman · Women undergoing embryo transfer as part of IVF or ICSI cycle

Ultrasound‐guided embryo transfer may leads to higher live birth and ongoing pregnancy (per woman randomised) compared with clinical touch (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Ultrasound versus 'clinical touch' for catheter guidance during embryo transfer in women 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.47 [1.3, 1.65]
13 studies · 5859 participants
Low