Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

5 questions · 8 findings · 2 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 6 · 75%Moderate 2 · 25%High 0 · 0%

Summary of findings for education and nutrition promotion programme vs no intervention

Nutritional status · people with dementia

3 findings from 1 review

Environmental and behavioural modifications for improving food and fluid intake in people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 656 participants
Low
Environmental and behavioural modifications for improving food and fluid intake in people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 52 participants
Low
Environmental and behavioural modifications for improving food and fluid intake in people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 734 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings for education and nutrition promotion programme vs no intervention

Nutritional status, measured by body weight (kg, · people with dementia

2 findings from 1 review

Environmental and behavioural modifications for improving food and fluid intake in people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 52 participants
Low
Environmental and behavioural modifications for improving food and fluid intake in people with dementia 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 656 participants
Moderate

Educational intervention vs no educational intervention

Wasting · children of complementary feeding age

Educational intervention showed no clear difference in nutritional status: wasting (WH/LZ ≤ −2 SD) Measurement: proportion… compared with no educational intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Educational interventions for improving primary caregiver complementary feeding practices for children aged 24 months… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.79 [0.48, 1.3]
2 studies · 2000 participants
Low

Educational intervention vs no educational intervention

Stunting · children of complementary feeding age

Educational intervention showed no clear difference in nutritional status: stunting (H/LAZ ≤ −2 SD) Measurement: proportion… compared with no educational intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Educational interventions for improving primary caregiver complementary feeding practices for children aged 24 months… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.89 [0.74, 1.06]
5 studies · 3487 participants
Low

Educational intervention vs no educational intervention

Underweight · children of complementary feeding age

Educational intervention showed no clear difference in nutritional status: underweight (WAZ ≤ −2 SD) Measurement:… compared with no educational intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Educational interventions for improving primary caregiver complementary feeding practices for children aged 24 months… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.99 [0.68, 1.44]
3 studies · 2900 participants
Low