Moisturisers vs no treatment (no moisturiser)
Number of participants reporting an adverse event · people with eczema
1 finding from 1 review
- 15.34 [0.9, 261.64]1 study · 173 participantsLow
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
9 questions · 9 findings · 1 reviews
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 11.1%Low 4 · 44.4%Moderate 4 · 44.4%High 0 · 0%
Moisturisers vs vehicle, placebo or no moisturiser
Number of participants reporting an adverse event · people with eczema
All moisturisers showed no clear difference in number of participants reporting an adverse event compared with vehicle, placebo or no moisturiser (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.03 [0.82, 1.3]10 studies · 1275 participantsModerate
Oat‐containing moisturisers vs vehicle or no moisturiser
Number of participants reporting an adverse event · people with eczema
Oat‐containing moisturisers showed no clear difference in number of participants reporting an adverse event compared with vehicle or no moisturiser (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 15.34 [0.9, 261.64]1 study · 173 participantsLow
Urea‐containing moisturisers vs vehicle, placebo or no moisturiser
Number of participants reporting an adverse event · people with eczema
Urea‐containing moisturisers probably leads to higher number of participants reporting an adverse event compared with vehicle, placebo or no moisturiser (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.65 [1.16, 2.34]1 study · 129 participantsModerate
Glycerin/glycerol‐containing moisturisers vs vehicle or placebo
Number of participants reporting an adverse event · people with eczema
Glycerin/glycerol‐containing moisturisers showed no clear difference in number of participants reporting an adverse event compared with vehicle or placebo (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.9 [0.68, 1.19]2 studies · 385 participantsModerate
Atopiclair vs vehicle
Number of participants reporting an adverse event · people with eczema
Atopiclair showed no clear difference in number of participants reporting an adverse event compared with vehicle (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.03 [0.79, 1.33]4 studies · 430 participantsModerate
Licochalcone‐containing moisturiser vs hydrocortisone acetate 1% cream
Number of participants reporting an adverse event · people with eczema
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 18 participantsLow
Vehicle treatment + daily moisturiser vs fluticasone propionate twice weekly + daily moisturiser
Number of participants reporting an adverse event · people with eczema
Vehicle treatment + daily moisturiser showed no clear difference in number of participants reporting an adverse event compared with fluticasone propionate twice weekly + daily moisturiser (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.51 [0.22, 1.14]4 studies · 718 participantsLow
Topical active treatment in combination with moisturiser vs topical active treatment alone
Number of participants reporting an adverse event · people with eczema
It is very uncertain whether topical active treatment in combination with moisturiser changes number of participants reporting an adverse event compared with topical active treatment alone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 0.39 [0.13, 1.19]1 study · 125 participantsVery low