Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews · Incontinence

No studies found 2 · 28.6%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 14.3%Moderate 4 · 57.1%High 0 · 0%

Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment vs another active treatment (PFMT + penile vibration pre and post‐operation versus PFMT pre and post‐operation)

Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · All men after radical prostatectomy

Prevention of UI after radical: one active treatment showed no clear difference in number of incontinent men after 12 months compared with another active treatment (PFMT + penile vibration pre and… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Prevention of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment

Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · All men after radical prostatectomy

Prevention of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback probably leads to lower number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months compared with no treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Treatment of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback vs no treatment;

Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · Patients with postprostatectomy UI

Treatment of UI after radical: PFMT ± biofeedback showed no clear difference in number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months compared with no treatment; (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Treatment of UI after radical: electric or magnetic energy vs no treatment

Number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months · Patients with postprostatectomy UI

Treatment of UI after radical: electric or magnetic energy probably leads to lower number of incontinent men ‐ after 12 months compared with no treatment (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review