Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · Orthodontics

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 3 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Headgear (extraoral appliance)

Non-compliance rate of the intervention · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or less at the start of treatment) undergoing orthodontic treatment to distalise upper first…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
Non-compliance rate not reported ("The remaining secondary outcomes and adverse effects were not reported by these studies").
0 studies
No studies found

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Another (different) intraoral distalising appliance

Non-compliance rate of the intervention · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or less at the start of treatment) undergoing orthodontic treatment to distalise upper first…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
Non-compliance rate not reported ("The remaining secondary outcomes and adverse effects were not reported by these studies").
0 studies
No studies found

Orthodontic distalising appliance (intraoral or extraoral) vs no intervention

Non-compliance rate of the intervention · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or less at the start of treatment) undergoing orthodontic treatment to distalise upper first…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
Non-compliance rate was not reported in the studies of this comparison.
0 studies
No studies found