evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 33.3%Moderate 2 · 66.7%High 0 · 0%

Routine invasive strategies vs selective invasive strategies (conservative)

Myocardial infarction · participants with UA/NSTEMI in the stent era

Routine invasive strategies showed no clear difference in myocardial infarction compared with selective invasive strategies (conservative) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine invasive strategies vs selective invasive strategies (conservative)

Fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction · participants with UA/NSTEMI in the stent era

Routine invasive strategies showed no clear difference in death or non‐fatal Myocardial infarction compared with selective invasive strategies (conservative) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine invasive strategies vs selective invasive strategies (conservative)

Complications of angiography or revascularization Procedure‐related myocardial infarction · participants with UA/NSTEMI in the stent era

Routine invasive strategies probably leads to higher complications of angiography or revascularization Procedure‐related… compared with selective invasive strategies (conservative) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review