Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

5 questions · 5 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 3 · 60%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 20%Low 1 · 20%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Natural cycle FET vs modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger)

Miscarriage · subfertile women

It is very uncertain whether natural cycle FET changes miscarriage rate per woman compared with modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cycle regimens for frozen‐thawed embryo transfer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.2 [0.01, 4.13]
1 study · 168 participants
Very low

Natural cycle FET vs HT FET

Miscarriage · subfertile women

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Cycle regimens for frozen‐thawed embryo transfer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Natural cycle FET vs HT + GnRHa FET

Miscarriage · subfertile women

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Cycle regimens for frozen‐thawed embryo transfer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger) vs HT FET

Miscarriage · subfertile women

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Cycle regimens for frozen‐thawed embryo transfer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger) vs HT + GnRHa FET

Miscarriage · subfertile women

Modified natural cycle FET (HCG trigger) showed no clear difference in miscarriage rate per woman compared with HT + GnRHa suppression FET (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cycle regimens for frozen‐thawed embryo transfer 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.74 [0.25, 2.19]
1 study · 236 participants
Low