Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2 · 66.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs sham CPAP

Minor adverse events · erectile dysfunction in men with obstructive sleep apnoea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive airway pressure therapy for improving erectile dysfunction in men with obstructive sleep apnoea 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs no CPAP

Minor adverse events · erectile dysfunction in men with obstructive sleep apnoea

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive airway pressure therapy for improving erectile dysfunction in men with obstructive sleep apnoea 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) vs phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors

Minor adverse events · erectile dysfunction in men with obstructive sleep apnoea

It is very uncertain whether continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) changes minor adverse events compared with phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive airway pressure therapy for improving erectile dysfunction in men with obstructive sleep apnoea 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.33 [0.34, 5.21]
1 study · 40 participants
Very low