Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

1 questions · 1 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 100%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- Altered fraction schedules vs conventional fractionation · Late genitourinary RT toxicity ≥ Grade II RTOG/EORTC
  Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1.05 [0.93, 1.18]
  4 studies · 3843 participants
  Moderate

Altered fraction schedules vs Conventional (standard) fractionation radiotherapy

Late genitourinary RT toxicity ≥ Grade II RTOG/EORTC · clinically localized prostate cancer

Altered fraction schedules showed no clear difference in late genitourinary RT toxicity ≥ Grade II RTOG/EORTC compared with conventional fractionation (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.05 [0.93, 1.18]
4 studies · 3843 participants
Moderate