Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

11 questions · 11 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 3 · 27.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 18.2%Low 5 · 45.5%Moderate 1 · 9.1%High 0 · 0%

Electrical stimulation vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT)

Incontinence‐specific quality of life · women with stress urinary incontinence

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 93 participants
Low

Electrical stimulation vs vaginal cones alone

Incontinence‐specific quality of life · women with stress urinary incontinence

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 96 participants
Low

Electrical stimulation vs PFMT plus vaginal cones

Incontinence‐specific quality of life · women with stress urinary incontinence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Electrical stimulation vs drug therapy

Incontinence‐specific quality of life · women with stress urinary incontinence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Electrical stimulation vs sham

Incontinence‐specific quality of life · women with stress urinary incontinence

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 117 participants
Low

Electrical stimulation vs No active treatment (control)

Incontinence‐specific quality of life · women with stress urinary incontinence

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 250 participants
Moderate

Electrical stimulation plus surgery vs surgery

Incontinence‐specific quality of life · women with stress urinary incontinence

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 120 participants
Low

PFMT added to electrical stimulation vs pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT)

Incontinence‐specific quality of life · women with stress urinary incontinence

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 193 participants
Very low

Surface ES vs intravaginal ES

Incontinence‐specific quality of life · women with stress urinary incontinence

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Low

Low intensity ES plus PFMT vs maximal intensity ES plus PFMT

Incontinence‐specific quality of life · women with stress urinary incontinence

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Conventional ES plus PFMT vs dynamic ES plus PFMT

Incontinence‐specific quality of life · women with stress urinary incontinence

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation with non‐implanted devices for stress urinary incontinence in women 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 61 participants
Very low