evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 33.3%Moderate 2 · 66.7%High 0 · 0%

Arm support with conventional mouse vs conventional mouse alone

Incidence of neck/shoulder disorder Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers

Arm support with conventional mouse showed no clear difference in incidence of neck or shoulder disorder Questionnaire followed by… compared with conventional mouse alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Arm support combined with alternative mouse vs conventional mouse alone

Incidence of neck/shoulder disorder Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers

Arm support combined with alternative mouse probably leads to lower incidence of neck or shoulder disorder Questionnaire followed by… compared with conventional mouse alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Arm support combined with alternative mouse vs conventional mouse alone

Incidence of upper body disorders (neck, shoulder, and upper extremity) Questionnaire followed by medical examination · office workers

Arm support combined with alternative mouse showed no clear difference in incidence of upper body disorders (neck, shoulder, and upper… compared with conventional mouse alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review