Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 25%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 25%High 2 · 50%

Gel agents vs hydroflotation agents used

Incidence of adhesions at second‐look laparoscopy · women during gynaecological surgery

Gel agents probably leads to lower incidence of adhesions at second‐look laparoscopy compared with hydroflotation agents used (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.5 [0.31, 0.83]
3 studies · 538 participants
Moderate

Gel agents vs no gel agents (or placebo)

Incidence of adhesions at second‐look laparoscopy · women having gynaecological surgery

Gel agents leads to lower incidence of adhesions at second‐look laparoscopy compared with no gel agents (or placebo) (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.26 [0.12, 0.57]
5 studies · 147 participants
High

Hydroflotation agents vs no hydroflotation agents (or placebo)

Incidence of adhesions at second‐look laparoscopy · women having gynaecological surgery

Hydroflotation agents leads to lower incidence of adhesions at second‐look laparoscopy compared with no hydroflotation agents (or placebo) (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.34 [0.22, 0.55]
4 studies · 566 participants
High

Steroids vs no steroids (or placebo)

Incidence of adhesions at second‐look laparoscopy · women after gynaecological surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found