Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Laser photocoagulation vs no intervention

Improvement of BCVA defined as ≥ 15 ETDRS letters (i.e. 3 ETDRS lines or 0.3 logMAR · people with diabetic macular oedema

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Monotherapy laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular oedema 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Subthreshold vs standard macular photocoagulation

Improvement of BCVA defined as ≥ 15 ETDRS letters (i.e. 3 ETDRS lines or 0.3 logMAR · people with diabetic macular oedema

It is very uncertain whether subthreshold changes improvement of BCVA defined as ≥ 15 ETDRS letters (i.e. 3 ETDRS… compared with standard macular photocoagulation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Monotherapy laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular oedema 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.31 [0.01, 7.09]
Studies not reported
Very low