Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

6 questions · 6 findings · 1 reviews · All outcomes

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 6 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

ITI SLActive titanium grade 4 implants vs ITI SLActive titanium-13zirconium (Roxolid) implants

Implant failure · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

ITI SLActive titanium grade 4 implants showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with ITI SLActive titanium-13zirconium (Roxolid) implants; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
1 year
RR 2.00 [0.18, 21.66]
1 study · 178 participants
GRADE not reported

NobelActive external connection implants vs NobelActive internal connection implants

Implant failure · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

NobelActive external connection implants showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with nobelActive internal connection implants; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
1 to 3 years
RR 1.06 [0.25, 4.51]
1 study · 113 participants
GRADE not reported

NobelActive external connection implants vs NobelReplace implants

Implant failure · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

NobelActive external connection implants showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with nobelReplace implants; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
1 to 3 years
RR 0.67 [0.17, 2.67]
1 study · 106 participants
GRADE not reported

NobelActive internal connection implants vs Nobel Speedy Groovy external connection implants

Implant failure · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
1 year
No failures; risk ratio not estimable (Pozzi 2014)
1 study · 34 participants
GRADE not reported

NobelActive internal connection implants vs NobelReplace implants

Implant failure · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

NobelActive internal connection implants showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with nobelReplace implants; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
1 to 3 years
RR 0.90 [0.25, 3.15]
1 study · 106 participants
GRADE not reported

ITI SLA standard (regular neck) implants vs ITI SLActive implants

Implant failure · Adults with missing teeth who received osseointegrated root-formed oral implants, functionally loaded and followed for at least 1 year

ITI SLA standard (regular neck) implants showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with ITI SLActive implants; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different types of dental implants 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
1 year
RR 5.00 [0.26, 98.00]
1 study · 40 participants
GRADE not reported