Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) vs water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM)

Haemorrhage · women with subfertility

It is very uncertain whether tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) changes haemorrhage compared with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.65 [0.4, 1.06]
2 studies · 662 participants
Very low

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) vs no intervention

Haemorrhage · women with subfertility

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found