Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg vs sham

Gain of 3 or more lines of visual acuity · macular edema in diabetes

It is very uncertain whether intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg changes gain of three or more lines visual acuity ‐ 24 months** compared with sham (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 4.12 [0.48, 34.99]
Studies not reported
Very low

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg vs macular laser

Gain 3+ lines of visual acuity at 1 year · macular edema in diabetes

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg showed no clear difference in gain of three or more lines visual acuity ‐ 12 months compared with macular laser (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.85 [0.55, 1.3]
Studies not reported
Low