Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews · Stroke

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 3 · 75%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 25%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Summary of findings: Restitutive interventions vs control

Falls · stroke survivors with visual field defects

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings: Compensative interventions vs control

Falls · stroke survivors with visual field defects

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings: Assessment/screening interventions vs control

Falls · stroke survivors with visual field defects

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings: Substitutive interventions vs control

Falls · stroke survivors with visual field defects

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Substitutive interventions changes falls (number of falls) After intervention compared with control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for visual field defects in people with stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.21 [0.26, 5.76]
1 study · 39 participants
Very low