Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 1 · 50%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- Summary of findings: partial salpingectomy vs clip · Failure rate: total (12 months)
  Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.21
  2 studies · 3537 participants
  Moderate
Direct match · question page
- Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy vs electrocoagulation · Failure rate: total (12 months)
  Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 4.47 [0.07, 286.78]
  1 study · 295 participants
  Low

Summary of findings: partial salpingectomy vs clip

Failure rate: total (12 months) · women requesting postpartum or interval sterilisation

Summary of findings: partial salpingectomy probably leads to lower failure rate: total (12 months) compared with clip (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.21
2 studies · 3537 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy vs electrocoagulation

Failure rate: total (12 months) · women > 6 weeks postpartum requesting tubal sterilisation

Summary of findings: modified Pomeroy partial salpingectomy showed no clear difference in failure rate: total (12 months) compared with electrocoagulation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Techniques for the interruption of tubal patency for female sterilisation 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 4.47 [0.07, 286.78]
1 study · 295 participants
Low