Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · Injuries

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 33.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 66.7%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Saphenous vein cutdown vs intraosseous route

Dislodgement of device · trainee paramedics using both methods of gaining parenteral access on cadavers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Comparison of routes for achieving parenteral access with a focus on the management of patients with Ebola virus disease 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intravenous vs subcutaneous route

Dislodgement of device · adults or children requiring parenteral access for infusion of fluids or medication

Intravenous may leads to higher dislodgement of device compared with subcutaneous route (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Comparison of routes for achieving parenteral access with a focus on the management of patients with Ebola virus disease 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 3.78 [1.16, 12.34]
1 study · 67 participants
Low

Intravenous vs intraosseous route

Dislodgement of device during infusion · adults or children requiring fluid delivered by a parenteral route (one study testing insertion and the volume of fluid delivered in…

Intravenous showed no clear difference in dislodgement of device during infusion compared with intraosseous route (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Comparison of routes for achieving parenteral access with a focus on the management of patients with Ebola virus disease 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.53 [0.18, 1.55]
1 study · 182 participants
Low