What do systematic reviews say?

8 questions · 8 findings · 2 reviews · Implants and prosthodontics

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 1 · 12.5%Very low 4 · 50%Low 3 · 37.5%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- Surgical anchorage (mini-screw or mid-palatal implant) vs Conventional anchorage (headgear, transpalatal/palatal arch, etc.) · Patient perception: discomfort
  Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Reported narratively in 2 studies (Chesterfield 2007, 47 patients; Feldmann 2007, 113 patients) on a VAS 0-100; discomfort most severe the evening after surgery (Nobel-Biocare onplant median 33, IQR 0-96) and after…
  2 studies · 160 participants
  GRADE not reported
Direct match · question page
- ARP with allograft vs ARP with xenograft · Complications (e.g. discomfort, pain and swelling)
  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
  6 months
  1 trial (Scheyer 2016) reported moderate glazing, redness and oedema, while 2 trials (Santana 2019; Serrano Mendez 2017) reported there were no adverse events
  3 studies · 87 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- ARP with allograft plus synthetic cell-binding peptide P-15 vs ARP with allograft without P-15 · Complications (e.g. discomfort, pain and swelling)
  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
  6 months
  Included study (Fernandes 2011) reported there were no adverse effects
  1 study · 18 participants
  Very low
Direct match · question page
- ARP with alloplast vs ARP with xenograft · Complications (e.g. discomfort, pain and swelling)
  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
  6 to 8 months
  1 trial (Patel 2013) reported pain, swelling, membrane exposure and partial loss of grafting material, while the other trial (Gholami 2012) reported that the procedure was uneventful
  2 studies · 37 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- ARP with xenograft (bone graft) vs Extraction alone · Complications (e.g. discomfort, pain and swelling)
  Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
  6 to 36 months
  1 trial (Cha 2019) reported delayed healing with partial exposure of the buccal plate at suture removal by 1 participant in the test group; another trial (Festa 2013) reported pain and swelling
  2 studies · 54 participants
  Low

Surgical anchorage (mini-screw or mid-palatal implant) vs Conventional anchorage (headgear, transpalatal/palatal arch, etc.)

Patient discomfort · Patients of any age undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances and requiring anchorage (adolescents to adults up to 48-54 years)

1 finding from 1 review

Reinforcement of anchorage during orthodontic brace treatment with implants or other surgical methods 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
Reported narratively in 2 studies (Chesterfield 2007, 47 patients; Feldmann 2007, 113 patients) on a VAS 0-100; discomfort most severe the evening after surgery (Nobel-Biocare onplant median 33, IQR 0-96) and after…
2 studies · 160 participants
GRADE not reported