Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

33 questions · 33 findings · 2 reviews · Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer

No studies found 8 · 24.2%GRADE not reported 3 · 9.1%Very low 7 · 21.2%Low 13 · 39.4%Moderate 1 · 3%High 1 · 3%

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

Diarrhoea (grade 1+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in diarrhoea (grade 1+) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Probiotics vs other active intervention

Grade ≥ 3 diarrhoea · participants with cancer treated with radiotherapy (with or without chemotherapy)

Probiotics may leads to lower severity of diarrhoea: grade 3 or higher compared with other active treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Proteolytic enzymes vs placebo or control

Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Proteolytic enzymes changes diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with control (placebo or no intervention) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Endorectal balloon vs no intervention

Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · Men undergoing RT for prostate cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Endorectal balloon changes diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review