Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

26 questions · 26 findings · 1 reviews · Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer

No studies found 8 · 30.8%GRADE not reported 3 · 11.5%Very low 6 · 23.1%Low 7 · 26.9%Moderate 1 · 3.8%High 1 · 3.8%

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention diet vs usual on‐treatment diet

Diarrhoea (grade 1+) · People undergoing pelvic radiotherapy for urological, gynaecological or colorectal cancer

Summary of findings: Diet interventions showed no clear difference in diarrhoea (grade 1+) compared with usual on‐treatment diet (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Proteolytic enzymes vs placebo or control

Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Proteolytic enzymes changes diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with control (placebo or no intervention) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Endorectal balloon vs no intervention

Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · Men undergoing RT for prostate cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Endorectal balloon changes diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Protein supplements vs no intervention

Diarrhoea (grade 2+) · People undergoing RT for pelvic cancer

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings: Protein supplements changes diarrhoea (grade 2+) compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review