Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between AG + GG genotype (G-allele carriers) vs AA genotype of LTF rs1126478 and dental caries susceptibility (AG + GG vs AA model: OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.81-1.23) in the Age group: Children subgroup; certainty not graded.
5 findings from 1 review
Show 2 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between GG genotype vs AA genotype of ENAM rs1264848 and dental caries susceptibility (GG vs AA model: OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.19-1.82) in the Age group: Children subgroup; certainty not graded.
6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between T allele vs C allele of ENAM rs3796703 and dental caries susceptibility (T vs C model: OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.24-3.58); certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between TT genotype vs CC + CT genotype of AMELX rs17878486 and dental caries susceptibility (TT vs CC + CT model: OR 6.17, 95% CI 0.41-92.05) in the Ethnicity: Caucasian subgroup; certainty not graded.
8 findings from 1 review
Show 5 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between CT genotype vs CC genotype of AMELX rs6639060 and dental caries susceptibility (CT vs CC model: OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.49-3.30) in the Age group: Adults subgroup; certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between AG + GG genotype (G-allele carriers) vs AA genotype of ENAM rs3796704 and dental caries susceptibility (AG + GG vs AA model: OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.03-2.17) in the Ethnicity: Mixed subgroup; certainty not graded.
6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between GG genotype vs AA genotype of LTF rs1126478 and dental caries susceptibility (GG vs AA model: OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.73-1.29) in the Ethnicity: Asian subgroup; certainty not graded.
5 findings from 1 review
Show 2 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between TT genotype vs CC genotype of AMELX rs17878486 and dental caries susceptibility (TT vs CC model: OR 5.12, 95% CI 0.09-278.85) in the Control group: Caries-free subgroup; certainty not graded.
8 findings from 1 review
Show 5 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Asian (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 0.33 (95% CI 0.01 to 12.82).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.33 [0.01, 12.82]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between CT + TT genotype (T-allele carriers) vs CC genotype of AMELX rs2106416 and dental caries susceptibility (CT + TT vs CC model: OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.15-2.31) in the Age group: Children subgroup; certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between G allele vs A allele of LTF rs1126478 and dental caries susceptibility (G vs A model: OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.87-1.10); certainty not graded.
5 findings from 1 review
Show 2 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Caucasian (n=2) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 0.73 (95% CI 0.19 to 2.87).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.73 [0.19, 2.87]
2 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between T allele vs C allele of AMELX rs17878486 and dental caries susceptibility (T vs C model: OR 2.87, 95% CI 0.35-23.23) in the Control group: Caries-free subgroup; certainty not graded.
8 findings from 1 review
Show 5 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between CT genotype vs CC genotype of AMELX rs2106416 and dental caries susceptibility (CT vs CC model: OR 1.20, 95% CI 0.65-2.22) in the Ethnicity: Caucasian subgroup; certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between GG genotype vs AA + AG genotype of ENAM rs1264848 and dental caries susceptibility (GG vs AA + AG model: OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.53-2.23) in the Ethnicity: Mixed subgroup; certainty not graded.
6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Asian (n=1) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 1.38 (95% CI 0.25 to 7.75).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.38 [0.25, 7.75]
1 study
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
The pooled odds ratio was 0.55 (95% CI 0.13 to 2.25).
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Age group: Children (n=4) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 0.95 (95% CI 0.80 to 1.13).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.95 [0.80, 1.13]
4 studies
GRADE not reported
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between TT genotype vs CC + CT genotype of AMELX rs2106416 and dental caries susceptibility (TT vs CC + CT model: OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.44-6.34) in the Ethnicity: Caucasian subgroup; certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Ethnicity: Caucasian (n=2) individuals with caries/high caries and controls
The pooled odds ratio was 2.03 (95% CI 0.10 to 42.44).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 2.03 [0.10, 42.44]
2 studies
GRADE not reported