Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Routine invasive strategies vs selective invasive strategies (conservative)

Death · participants with UA/NSTEMI in the stent era

Routine invasive strategies showed no clear difference in death compared with selective invasive strategies (conservative) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine invasive strategies versus selective invasive strategies for unstable angina and non‐ST elevation myocardial… 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.87 [0.64, 1.18]
8 studies · 8915 participants
Low

Routine invasive strategies vs selective invasive strategies (conservative)

Fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction · participants with UA/NSTEMI in the stent era

Routine invasive strategies showed no clear difference in death or non‐fatal Myocardial infarction compared with selective invasive strategies (conservative) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Routine invasive strategies versus selective invasive strategies for unstable angina and non‐ST elevation myocardial… 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.93 [0.71, 1.2]
7 studies · 7715 participants
Low