Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · Incontinence

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2 · 66.7%GRADE not reported 1 · 33.3%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Surgery with excision of failed tape vs surgery without excision of tape

Condition‐specific instruments designed to assess incontinence ‐ e.g. BFLUTS · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for treating recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive synthetic midurethral… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

One type of repeat midurethral tape vs another type of repeat midurethral tape

Condition‐specific instruments designed to assess incontinence ‐ e.g. BFLUTS · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for treating recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive synthetic midurethral… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
46 participants
GRADE not reported

Repeat midurethral tape (any type) vs any other non‐tape surgical treatment (e.g. traditional sling, colposuspension, injectables)

Condition‐specific instruments designed to assess incontinence ‐ e.g. BFLUTS · women with recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive midurethral tape surgery

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for treating recurrent stress urinary incontinence after failed minimally invasive synthetic midurethral… 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found