Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 6 findings · 1 reviews · Vascular

No studies found 3 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 16.7%Moderate 2 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%

Clinically relevant bleeding · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

Unfractionated heparin showed no clear difference in clinically relevant bleeding compared with no thromboprophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Clinically relevant bleeding · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

Low‐molecular‐weight heparin probably leads to higher clinically relevant bleeding compared with no thromboprophylaxis (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Clinically relevant bleeding · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

3 findings from 1 review

Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Primary prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Clinically relevant bleeding · ambulatory cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

Ultra‐low‐molecular‐weight heparin showed no clear difference in clinically relevant bleeding compared with placebo (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review