Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 2 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Tubal flushing with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) vs no intervention

Clinical pregnancy · women with subfertility

Tubal flushing with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) showed no clear difference in clinical pregnancy compared with no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.14 [0.71, 1.84]
1 study · 334 participants
Low

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) vs water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM)

Clinical pregnancy · women with subfertility

Tubal flushing with oil‐soluble contrast media (OSCM) may leads to higher clinical pregnancy compared with water‐soluble contrast media (WSCM) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tubal flushing for subfertility 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 1.42 [1.1, 1.85]
6 studies · 2598 participants
Low