What do systematic reviews say?

100 questions · 103 findings · 2 reviews · Endodontics and dental trauma

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 69 · 67%Very low 18 · 17.5%Low 11 · 10.7%Moderate 5 · 4.9%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- Biodentine vs Calcium hydroxide (CH) · Clinical failure
  Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
  6 and 12 months
  RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.72]
  1 study · 62 participants
  GRADE not reported
Direct match · question page
- Endoflas chlorophenol free (Endoflas-CF) vs Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE) · Clinical failure
  Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
  6 months
  RR 3.00 [0.13, 68.26]
  1 study
  GRADE not reported
Direct match · question page
- Erbium:YAG laser vs Formocresol (FC) · Clinical failure
  Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
  24 months
  RR 2.13 [0.20, 22.70]
  1 study · 97 participants
  GRADE not reported
Direct match · question page
- Ankaferd Blood Stopper (ABS) vs Formocresol (FC) · Clinical failure
  Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
  6 and 12 months
  RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.58]
  1 study · 30 participants
  GRADE not reported
Direct match · question page
- Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Formocresol (FC) · Clinical failure
  Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
  24 months
  RR 3.83 [1.68, 8.74]
  1 study · 120 participants
  Low

Glutaraldehyde + zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE) vs Full strength formocresol (FC)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Glutaraldehyde + zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with full strength formocresol (FC); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
3 months
RR 0.46 [0.04, 4.74]
1 study · 48 participants
GRADE not reported

Biodentine vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Biodentine showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with calcium hydroxide (CH); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 and 12 months
RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.72]
1 study · 62 participants
GRADE not reported

Low‐level laser therapy vs Formocresol (FC)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 and 12 months
No clinical failure in any participant (Fernandes 2015); not estimable
1 study · 30 participants
GRADE not reported

Ferric sulphate (FS) + mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE) pulpectomy

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Ferric sulphate/MTA pulpotomy showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE) pulpectomy; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
18 months
RR 2.16 [0.23, 20.35]
1 study · 172 participants
GRADE not reported

Diode laser vs electrosurgery

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

It is very uncertain whether diode laser changes clinical failure compared with electrosurgery (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 months
RR 0.20 [0.01, 3.70]
2 studies · 50 participants
Very low

Total-etching 36% phosphoric acid + acetone-based total-etch adhesive vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

It is very uncertain whether total-etching 36% phosphoric acid + acetone-based total-etch adhesive changes clinical failure compared with calcium hydroxide (CH) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 and 24 months
RR 3.00 [0.13, 69.52]
1 study · 40 participants
Very low

Glutaraldehyde + calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Full strength formocresol (FC)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Glutaraldehyde + calcium hydroxide (CH) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with full strength formocresol (FC); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
3 months
RR 1.10 [0.17, 7.10]
1 study · 44 participants
GRADE not reported

Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs 3Mixtatin

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

It is very uncertain whether mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) changes clinical failure compared with 3Mixtatin (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 0.67 [0.12, 3.78]
1 study · 160 participants
Very low

Non-rinse conditioner + acetone-based total-etch adhesive vs Acetone-based total-etch adhesive

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
up to 24 months
No clinical failure in any participant (Demir 2007); not estimable
1 study · 40 participants
Very low

3Mix (ciprofloxacin + metronidazole + minocycline) vs simvastatin

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

It is very uncertain whether 3Mix (ciprofloxacin + metronidazole + minocycline) changes clinical failure compared with simvastatin (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 1.00 [0.51, 1.95]
1 study · 160 participants
Very low

Aloe vera vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Aloe vera led to higher clinical failure compared with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 months
RR 51.00 [3.25, 801.15]
1 study · 60 participants
GRADE not reported

Self-etch adhesive + acetone-based total-etch adhesive vs Acetone-based total-etch adhesive

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

It is very uncertain whether self-etch adhesive + acetone-based total-etch adhesive changes clinical failure compared with acetone-based total-etch adhesive (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6, 12 and 24 months
RR 3.00 [0.13, 69.52]
1 study · 40 participants
Very low

Endoflas chlorophenol free (Endoflas-CF) vs Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Endoflas chlorophenol free (Endoflas-CF) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 months
RR 3.00 [0.13, 68.26]
1 study
GRADE not reported

Erbium:YAG laser vs Formocresol (FC)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Erbium:YAG laser showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with formocresol (FC); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
24 months
RR 2.13 [0.20, 22.70]
1 study · 97 participants
GRADE not reported

Ankaferd Blood Stopper (ABS) vs Formocresol (FC)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Ankaferd Blood Stopper (ABS) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with formocresol (FC); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 and 12 months
RR 0.33 [0.01, 7.58]
1 study · 30 participants
GRADE not reported

OrthoMTA vs RetroMTA

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

OrthoMTA showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with retroMTA; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 3.13 [0.13, 74.85]
1 study · 96 participants
GRADE not reported

Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Formocresol (FC)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Calcium hydroxide (CH) may leads to higher clinical failure compared with formocresol (FC) (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
24 months
RR 3.83 [1.68, 8.74]
1 study · 120 participants
Low
Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 1.87 [1.22, 2.89]
6 studies · 332 participants
Moderate

3Mixtatin vs simvastatin

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

3Mixtatin may leads to lower clinical failure compared with simvastatin (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 0.25 [0.08, 0.82]
1 study · 160 participants
Low

Glutaraldehyde + calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Glutaraldehyde + zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Glutaraldehyde + calcium hydroxide (CH) showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with glutaraldehyde + zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
12 months
RR 2.90 [0.32, 26.38]
1 study · 61 participants
GRADE not reported

Electrosurgery vs Ferric sulphate (FS)

Clinical failure · Children with extensive decay involving the dental pulp in primary teeth

Electrosurgery showed no clear difference in clinical failure compared with ferric sulphate (FS) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Pulp treatment for extensive decay in primary teeth 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
6 months
RR 0.56 [0.13, 2.34]
2 studies · 50 participants
Low