Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 2 · 66.7%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg vs macular laser

Change in visual acuity (logMAR) ‐ 12 months (negative is better) · macular edema in diabetes

It is very uncertain whether intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg changes change in visual acuity (logMAR) ‐ 12 months (negative is better) compared with macular laser (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
MD 0.02
Studies not reported
Very low

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg vs antiVEGF

Change in visual acuity (logMAR) ‐ 12 months (negative is better) · macular edema in diabetes

1 finding from 1 review

Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 30 participants
Low

Intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection 4 mg vs sham

Visual acuity · macular edema in diabetes

1 finding from 1 review

Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low