It is very uncertain whether assessment changes rate of caesarean section compared with direct admission (very low certainty).
Continuous CTG may leads to higher caesarean section compared with intermittent auscultation (low certainty).
Routine fetal movement counting showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with mixed or undefined fetal movement counting (low certainty).
Traditional antenatal CTG showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with no antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complication) (low certainty).
Computerised antenatal CTG showed no clear difference in caesarean section compared with traditional antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complications) (low certainty).
One‐to‐one structured care showed no clear difference in rate of caesarean section compared with usual care (high certainty).
Home support showed no clear difference in rate of caesarean section compared with telephone triage (moderate certainty).
Admission cardiotocography showed no clear difference in incidence of caesarean section compared with intermittent auscultation (low‐risk women) (moderate certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.