Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · Anaesthesia

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 2 · 66.7%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs protocol using standard measures such

Adverse outcomes ‐ all · patients with proximal femoral fracture

It is very uncertain whether advanced haemodynamic monitoring changes adverse outcomes ‐ all compared with protocol using standard measures such (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.9 [0.37, 2.18]
3 studies · 280 participants
Very low

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs usual care

Adverse outcomes ‐ all · patients with perioperative fluid optimization

Advanced haemodynamic monitoring showed no clear difference in adverse outcomes ‐ all compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.78 [0.57, 1.05]
2 studies · 173 participants
Low

Protocol using standard measures such as CVP vs usual care

Adverse outcomes ‐ all · patients with perioperative fluid optimization

Protocol using standard measures such as CVP showed no clear difference in adverse outcomes ‐ all compared with usual care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.53 [0.26, 1.08]
1 study · 60 participants
Low