Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · previously treated patients with mRCC
Targeted immunotherapy alone probably leads to lower adverse events (grade ≥ 3) compared with standard targeted therapies (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events grade 3 to 5 Range of
Early taxane‐based chemotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may leads to higher grade III to V adverse events compared with ADT only (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · previously untreated patients with mRCC
Interferon‐α combined with targeted therapies may leads to higher adverse events (grade ≥ 3) compared with standard targeted therapy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events grade 3 to 5 Range of · participants with advanced or metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer
Immune checkpoint inhibitors probably leads to lower adverse events grade 3 to 5 Range of compared with any first‐line chemotherapy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events grade 3 to 5 Range of · participants with advanced or metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer
Immune checkpoint inhibitors may leads to lower adverse events grade 3 to 5 Range of compared with any second‐line chemotherapy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Sunitinib showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with avelumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Sunitinib showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with pembrolizumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy +… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
It is very uncertain whether sunitinib changes serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with atezolizumab + bevacizumab (targeted agent versus immunotherapy +… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
Temsirolimus may leads to lower serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Bevacizumab + IFN probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
Temsirolimus + IFN‐α may leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IFN‐α (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
Temsirolimus + bevacizumab showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with bevacizumab + IFN‐α (targeted agent + targeted agent versus targeted… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
Everolimus + bevacizumab showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IFN α‐2a + bevacizumab (targeted agent + targeted agent versus… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type); IMDC intermediate, poor risk patients only.
Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with nivolumab + ipilimumab (targeted agent versus combinations of… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4)assessed as: CTCAE v3.0 compared with interferon‐α (IFN‐α) (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · previously untreated patients with mRCC
Interferon‐α alone probably leads to lower adverse events (grade ≥ 3) compared with interferon‐α plus bevacizumab (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · previously untreated patients with mRCC
Interferon‐α plus bevacizumab showed no clear difference in adverse events (grade ≥ 3) compared with standard targeted therapies (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · previously untreated patients with mRCC
Vaccine treatment showed no clear difference in adverse events (grade ≥ 3) compared with standard therapies (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (grade ≥ 3) · previously untreated patients with mRCC
Interferon‐α alone may leads to higher adverse events (grade ≥ 3) compared with standard targeted therapies (sunitinib or temsirolimus) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review