Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 50%GRADE not reported 1 · 50%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Larger coaxial microincision cataract surgery (C‐MICS) vs standard phacoemulsification

Adverse events (corneal edema) · people with age‐related cataract

Larger coaxial microincision cataract surgery (C‐MICS) led to higher adverse events (corneal edema) compared with standard phacoemulsification; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Different‐sized incisions for phacoemulsification in age‐related cataract 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.02
Studies not reported
GRADE not reported

Smaller coaxial microincision cataract surgery (C‐MICS) vs larger C‐MICS

Adverse events · people with age‐related cataract

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Different‐sized incisions for phacoemulsification in age‐related cataract 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found