Wound infection · people with pressure ulcers
Hydrogel dressings showed no clear difference in adverse events (wound infection) compared with hydrogel dressings (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse effects (wound pain) · people with pressure ulcers
Hydrogel dressings showed no clear difference in adverse events (wound‐related pain) compared with hydrogel dressings (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (pain on dressing removal) · people with pressure ulcers
Hydrogel dressings showed no clear difference in adverse events (pain on dressing removal) compared with hydrogel dressings (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · people with pressure ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · people with diabetes and foot ulcers
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · adults with skin graft donor sites
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings 2. Octenidine‐dihydrochloride (OCT) hydrogel… changes adverse events compared with OCT‐free placebo hydrogel dressings (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events · children with skin graft donor sites
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events (not reported) · people with pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events (not reported) · people with pressure ulcers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events, short‐term · people of any age with an existing pressure ulcer of Category/Stage II or above
It is very uncertain whether foam dressing changes adverse events, short‐term compared with hydrogel dressing (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review