Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 2 reviews · Skin

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 33.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%

Chemical peeling vs combined chemical peeling plus any active intervention

Investigator‐assessed adverse events (short‐term) · people with acne scars

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for acne scars 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Chemical peeling vs combined chemical peeling plus any active intervention

Participant‐assessed adverse events (short‐term) N of participants with adverse events · people with acne scars

It is very uncertain whether chemical peeling changes participant‐assessed adverse events (short‐term) N of participants… compared with combined chemical peeling plus any active intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for acne scars 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.83, 1.2]
1 study · 20 participants
Very low

Corticosteroid creams/ointments: clobetasol propionate foam vs vehicle foam

Primary: adverse events ‐ any adverse event treatment‐related (application site pruritus) · participants with moderate to severe hand eczema

Corticosteroid creams/ointments: clobetasol propionate foam showed no clear difference in primary: adverse events ‐ any adverse event treatment‐related… compared with vehicle foam (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for hand eczema 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.02 [0.06, 15.89]
1 study · 125 participants
Moderate