Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

891 questions · 902 findings · 317 reviews

No studies found 210 · 23.3%GRADE not reported 56 · 6.2%Very low 236 · 26.2%Low 220 · 24.4%Moderate 146 · 16.2%High 34 · 3.8%

Bortezomib vs no bortezomib

Adverse Events: Peripheral Neuropathy ‐ Bortezomib versus no bortezomib (same background therapy) · All patients with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma

Bortezomib may leads to higher adverse Events: Peripheral Neuropathy ‐ Bortezomib versus no… compared with no bortezomib (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors vs any first‐line chemotherapy

Adverse events grade 3 to 5 Range of · participants with advanced or metastatic muscle invasive bladder cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors probably leads to lower adverse events grade 3 to 5 Range of compared with any first‐line chemotherapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs avelumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted agent)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with avelumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs pembrolizumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted agent)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with pembrolizumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy +… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs atezolizumab + bevacizumab (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted agent)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

It is very uncertain whether sunitinib changes serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with atezolizumab + bevacizumab (targeted agent versus immunotherapy +… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bevacizumab + IFN vs IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Bevacizumab + IFN probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Temsirolimus + IFN‐α vs IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Temsirolimus + IFN‐α may leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IFN‐α (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Temsirolimus + bevacizumab vs bevacizumab + IFN‐α (targeted agent + targeted agent versus targeted agent + classic immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Temsirolimus + bevacizumab showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with bevacizumab + IFN‐α (targeted agent + targeted agent versus targeted… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Everolimus + bevacizumab vs bevacizumab + IFN‐α (targeted agent + targeted agent versus targeted agent + classic immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Everolimus + bevacizumab showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IFN α‐2a + bevacizumab (targeted agent + targeted agent versus… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs adjuvant immunotherapy (combined ipilimumab and nivolumab)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type); IMDC intermediate, poor risk patients only.

Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with nivolumab + ipilimumab (targeted agent versus combinations of… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bortezomib vs no bortezomib

Adverse Events: Infections (All) ‐ Bortezomib versus no bortezomib (different background therapy or other agents) · All patients with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma

Bortezomib may leads to higher adverse Events: Infections (All) ‐ Bortezomib versus no bortezomib… compared with no bortezomib (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bortezomib vs no bortezomib

Adverse Events: Cardiac Disorders ‐ Bortezomib versus no bortezomib (different background therapy or other agents) · All patients with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma

Bortezomib leads to higher adverse Events: Cardiac Disorders ‐ Bortezomib versus no bortezomib… compared with no bortezomib (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bortezomib vs no bortezomib

Adverse Events: Peripheral Neuropathy ‐ Bortezomib versus no bortezomib (different background therapy or other agents) · All patients with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma

Bortezomib leads to higher adverse Events: Peripheral Neuropathy ‐ Bortezomib versus no… compared with no bortezomib (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Amifostine vs no treatment/placebo

Adverse effects (other reported events) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
1 finding from 1 review

Pilocarpine vs no treatment/placebo

Adverse effects (other reported events) · Patients receiving radiotherapy on its own or in addition to chemotherapy to the head and neck region
1 finding from 1 review

Taxane followed by anthracyclines vs anthracyclines followed by taxane

Grade 3 to 4 neutropenia · adjuvant therapy for early breast cancer

Taxane followed by anthracyclines leads to lower adverse events: neutropenia (grade 3/4) ( compared with anthracyclines followed by taxane (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review