Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews · Incontinence

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2 · 66.7%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%

Hydrophilic‐coated catheter vs uncoated catheter

Adverse effects (urethral trauma/bleeding/haematuria) · long‐term bladder management

Hydrophilic‐coated catheter probably leads to higher adverse effects (urethral trauma/bleeding/haematuria) compared with uncoated catheter (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long‐term bladder conditions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.37 [1.01, 1.87]
3 studies · 400 participants
Moderate

Aseptic technique vs clean technique

Adverse effects (urethral trauma/bleeding/haematuria) · long‐term bladder management

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long‐term bladder conditions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Single‐use (sterile) catheter vs multiple‐use (clean) catheter

Adverse effects (urethral trauma/bleeding/haematuria) · long‐term bladder management

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Intermittent catheter techniques, strategies and designs for managing long‐term bladder conditions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found