evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

5 questions · 5 findings · 4 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 1 · 20%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 20%Moderate 3 · 60%High 0 · 0%

Summary of findings table ‐ Midwife continuity models vs other models of care

Admission to neonatal special care unit or intensive care unit · childbearing women and their infants (all) (important/secondary outcomes)

Summary of findings table ‐ Midwife continuity models showed no clear difference in admission to special care nursery/neonatal intensive care unit compared with other models of care (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Traditional antenatal CTG vs no antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complication)

Admission to neonatal special care unit or intensive care unit · Pregnant women with/without complications

Traditional antenatal CTG showed no clear difference in admission to neonatal special care unit or intensive care unit compared with no antenatal CTG (women at increased risk of complication) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

All routine Doppler ultrasound vs no Doppler ultrasound

Admission to neonatal special care unit or intensive care unit · Pregnant women in unselected or low‐risk populations.

All routine Doppler ultrasound showed no clear difference in neonatal admission to special care baby unit/neonatal intensive care… compared with no Doppler ultrasound (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review