Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews · Stroke

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 25%Low 2 · 50%Moderate 1 · 25%High 0 · 0%

tDCS plus speech and language therapy (SLT) vs sham tDCS plus SLT

Functional communication · patients with improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in adults with aphasia after stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 112 participants
Low

tDCS plus speech and language therapy (SLT) vs sham tDCS plus SLT

Language impairment: accuracy of naming nouns at · patients with improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in adults with aphasia after stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
11 studies · 298 participants
Moderate

tDCS plus speech and language therapy (SLT) vs sham tDCS plus SLT

Language impairment: accuracy of naming verbs post intervention Accuracy in verb naming. Scale from: −infinity to +infinity · patients with improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in adults with aphasia after stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 21 participants
Very low

tDCS plus speech and language therapy (SLT) vs sham tDCS plus SLT

tDCS plus speech and language therapy (SLT) versus sham tDCS plus SLT for improving aphasia: dropouts Dropouts and adverse events · patients with improving aphasia in patients with aphasia after stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for improving aphasia in adults with aphasia after stroke 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
15 studies · 345 participants
Low