evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

7 questions · 7 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 1 · 14.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 6 · 85.7%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Wavefront‐optimized procedures vs wavefront‐guided procedures

Eyes within ± 0.5 D of target refraction · Adults with refractive errors

Wavefront‐optimized procedures showed no clear difference in proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 diopters (D) of target refraction… compared with wavefront‐guided procedures (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Wavefront‐optimized procedures vs wavefront‐guided procedures

Proportion of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better post‐treatment. ‐ 12 months · Adults with refractive errors

Wavefront‐optimized procedures showed no clear difference in proportion of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or… compared with wavefront‐guided procedures (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Wavefront‐optimized procedures vs wavefront‐guided procedures

Loss of 1 or more lines of BSCVA at 12 months post treatment · Adults with refractive errors

Wavefront‐optimized procedures showed no clear difference in proportion of eyes that had lost 1 or more lines of best… compared with wavefront‐guided procedures (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review