evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

8 questions · 8 findings · 1 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 2 · 25%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 6 · 75%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment vs Ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment

Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development

Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in pressure ulcer incidence Visual skin assessment compared with ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment vs pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement

Proportion of participants developing a new pressure ulcer · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development

Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in pressure ulcer incidence Visual skin assessment compared with pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment vs Ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment

Severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 1 · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development

Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 1 compared with ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment vs Ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment

Severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 2 · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development

Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 2 compared with ramstadius pressure ulcer risk assessment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment vs pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement

Severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 1 · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development

Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 1 compared with pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment vs pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement

Severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 2 · individuals at risk of pressure ulcer development

Waterlow pressure ulcer risk assessment showed no clear difference in severity of new pressure ulcers ‐ Stage 2 compared with pressure ulcer risk assessment using clinical judgement (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review